116
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      King Salman Center for Disability Research "KSCDR" is pleased to invite you to submit your scientific research to the "Journal of Disability Research - JDR", where the "JDR" comes within the Center's strategy aimed at maximizing the impact of research on the scientific field, by supporting and publishing scientific research on disability and its issues, which reflect positively on the level of services, rehabilitation, and care for individuals with disabilities.
      "JDR" is a scientific journal that has the lead in covering all areas of human, health and scientific disability at the regional and international levels.

      scite_
       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Emotional and Behavioral Problems Among Higher-grade Students

      Published
      research-article
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            The current study investigates emotional and behavioral disorders among students in higher grades, focusing on both private and public sector schools. Moreover, the research is conducted in two phases that involve translation and validation of an assessment instrument, followed by administration to a sample of 406 students between the ranges of 13-18 years of age. In phase one, the instrument was translated and the translated version was administered to a sample N = 20. The effectiveness of items within the instruments was addressed and the scale exhibited good internal consistency and reliability. For the main study, the Problem with School Children Scale (PWSCS) was administered to a sample of 406 students with ages ranging from 13 to 18 years. Multiple regression and independent t-tests were used to analyze the data. The result showed that secondary high school students exhibited higher emotional problems as compared to behavioral problems. The finding also revealed that students from private schools face higher levels of emotional and behavioral problems compared to those from government schools. This study also revealed that demographic variables (socioeconomic status and family structure) did not significantly predict emotional and behavioral problems positively, while other demographic variables (gender, illness, and school type) did not significantly predict emotional and behavioral problems negatively among secondary high school students. These results highlight the significance of addressing emotional and behavioral issues among higher-grade students and recommend the importance of targeted interventions in both sectors.

            Main article text

            INTRODUCTION

            An individual with a behavioral disability experiences changes in his or her thoughts and emotions that result in challenging behaviors ( Salwa et al., 2014). When children suffer from emotional and behavioral problems, they often have poor school adjustment, low efficiency, high absenteeism rates, low self-esteem, social incompetence, loneliness, and little feeling of well-being later in life ( Konu et al., 2002). The upcoming period of every socialized and advanced community depends on the development and proper growth of children ( Zelizer, 2014). Over the past few decades, kindergartners and teens have acquired a unique status in the world. Attention to children’s well-being and rights has opened new doors to countenance at the children’s growth and development ( Wilmshurst, 2009). Parents usually used strict castigating and effective measures to adjust the adolescent to the principles and regulations; strict castigating was considered a common and correct approach to controlling children ( Santrock, 2007). The adolescents were subjected to forced labor, framed to work for long durations in hazardous conditions for very little pay and without any lawful due ( Berk, 2006). The concerns of the community for the physical and mental health of the youths were almost non-existent. There was no medical complex available for children either ( Berk, 2006).

            Childhood is the most consequential and determined period of natural life and a thriving adolescent is important for subsequent growth and development. Alongside developmental changes, the periods of adolescence and kindergarten are under the authority of social, emotional, physical, and biological building blocks. These blocks also contribute to making it a nerve-racking experience, thus making the adolescents more responsive to developing behavioral and emotional problems ( Santos et al., 2016). Children’s rights were apprehended across humanity. Multiple voluntary and government-sponsored organizations have started work to ensure adolescents’ rights. The economic and industrial revolution in the West and advancement in medical science were the main factors responsible for providing cognizance about kindergarten and adolescents. Contemporary technology, good communication, ceaseless educational expansion, and increased societal cognizance made kindergarteners and adolescents an integral part of society ( Wilmshurst, 2009). Even then, with increasing advantages and extended knowledge, child and adolescent psychopathologists have sought sober concentration in the last 20 years ( Rutter and Stevenson, 2008). Presently, researchers contend with the major and important issue of mental health problems in kindergarteners and adolescents ( Heyerdahl et al., 2004). Various studies have been carried out on emotional and behavioral problems ( Lau and Kan, 2010). It is alarming to note that emotional and behavioral problems in some schools in Pakistan have been noted to be higher than those in other countries, as concluded from a study in private and community schools ( Syed et al., 2009).

            Numerous studies have shown that in the later stage of life, a strong relationship is established between unpleasant childhood experiences and psychopathology ( Foley and Weinraub, 2017). It has also been recommended that early and timely documentation of emotional and behavioral challenges of kindergarten and adolescents may head off the extended unhealthy consequences related to mental health problems, which are not identified and not treated ( Freeman et al., 2011). According to Syed et al. (2009), 18.3% of children in secondary schools reported emotional problems, and 35.8% reported behavioral problems. School children in Pakistan were also assessed using Rutter rating scales for behavioral and emotional problems. Using the Rutter behavioral scale, another study conducted on 957 schoolchildren in India found behavioral problems in 45.6% of children, with 36.5% having major behavioral problems ( Hong et al., 2015). According to a study conducted in India ( McConaughy, 1993), 25.6% and 74.4% of high school students had behavioral problems.

            The core aims of this research include:

            • Exploring the emotional and behavioral disabilities among high school children.

            • Determining the emotional and behavioral problems in public and private high schools.

            METHODOLOGY

            This research aims to explore emotional and behavioral issues among secondary school students. For this purpose, 20 secondary high school students were pre-tested and interviewed to examine the clarity and comprehensibility of the translated scales. The study comprised two phases. In phase one, the scale was translated from English to Urdu. In phase two, this translated version of the scale was used to assess behavioral and emotional problems among secondary high school students. Furthermore, this phase involved administering the translated “Problem with School Children Scale (PWSCS)” to a sample of 406 students who were evenly distributed in both public and private sector schools. The data analysis of this study comprised summary statistics, a t-test for comparing emotional and behavioral issues across these two categories, and a multiple regression model to assess the effect of demographic factors on emotional and behavioral issues.

            Translation of PWSCS

            The scale was developed by the Canadian Pediatric Association in 2012 to identify psychological problems among school children. It contains 30 items; all of the items have a 3-point range of responses (1-3) from 1 (No Concern), 2 (Minor Concern), and 3 (Major Concern). The total score ranges from 30 to 90, which shows that the higher the score, the higher the problematic behavior. The reliability of the questionnaire is 0.93 for secondary high school–age youth. The questionnaire has no copyright protection. The translation of PWSCS was carried out in the following five steps.

            Forward translation of PWSCS

            The PWSCS English version was translated into the Urdu language by following the guidelines. One male and two female translators, bilingual in English and Urdu and holding MS degrees in Psychology explained the purpose and nature of the instrument to maintain the quality of the translation. They were asked to translate the scale conceptually, using simple language and retaining the cultural context while avoiding any jargon. Three independent forward translations were obtained.

            Expert panel

            The expert panel comprised three members: two were MS students in clinical psychology and the third one was a faculty member of Psychology with experience in psychometrics. The MS students were approached based on their experience in research, which averaged 2-3 years. The expert panel reviewed all three Urdu translations of PWSCS and a final translated version was agreed upon. Those words and phrases that were conceptually closer to the English items, simple, and culturally relevant were selected.

            Back translation

            The final version was translated by a female bilingual translator who holds a Master’s degree in English. The purpose was to assess the conceptual equivalence of the translated scale with the original scale. The back translation was reviewed against the source language. All the items were conceptually relevant to the original English version of PWSCS.

            Pre-testing and cognitive interviewing

            The version approved in the previous step was then pre-tested.

            Pre-test sample

            For this purpose, 20 secondary high school students (10 boys, 10 girls) were randomly selected from the targeted population. The age group of the sample was from 13 to 18 years [ M = 23.31, standard deviation (SD) = 1.70].

            Final version of PWSCS

            The cognitive interviewing informed that none of the items was difficult to read or comprehend for the participants. Hence, PWSCS was considered ready to be used in the main study.

            Unique adolescents are said to be the backbone of every society. Many studies have asserted the significance of increased investment in child development that can help them become useful citizens of society ( Miller and Jones, 2014). Children are highly dependent on their parents or guardians and are helpless on their own, so the most important responsibility of a family is to provide protection, care, and sympathy to their children ( Aynsley-Green, 2014). This has not always been the situation. At the beginning of the Renaissance and self-rule, adolescents and youth gained a distinct position in humanity, and the acceptance of adolescents as human beings is a very recent phenomenon ( Wilmshurst, 2009). Previously adolescents and youth had no rights and were treated as servants by the state and society ( Wolfe, 2016).

            Society and parents humiliate and abandon their children and brutal discipline is used to treat them ( Gelfand et al., 2013). In the 19th century, adolescents had an extravagant death rate due to unbalanced nourishment, and insalubrious and unsanitary medium ( Berk, 2006). Gradually, after centuries of harsh treatment and neglect the behavior of society toward children started changing. Childhood and youthfulness began to be considered as an important part of human life and gained greater attention from researchers and authorities ( Burt, 2012).

            Two major factors extensively provided toward the uprising the attentiveness towards a child. The primary agent was economic development and industrialization ( Wolfe, 2016). The rapid development in technologies and machines had sufficiently minimized the claim for work. Urbanization puts the world’s concentration on children. There was a change of center from child labor to adolescent rights as the bill for mandatory schooling for children was passed in the United States of America ( Wilmshurst, 2009).

            Behavior problems

            Any unusual kind of behavior that is above the supposed norms for age and level of growth can be depicted as a behavioral problem. It has been explained by Coholic and Eys (2015), as culturally abnormal behavior(s) of such emotion, prevalence, or duration that the physical protection of the individual or others is likely to be set up in severe distress or behavior which is likely to severely bound to use of common community facilities. Behavior can be viewed as “abnormal,” while normal deduces the “average”, “standard” and “regular” Thus the idea of “abnormal” indicates a significant deviation from the “standard” or “average”.

            Generally, the most common complaint in school children when depressed is abdominal pain or nausea, which leads to an undisciplined environment in the classroom ( Darewych and Bowers, 2017). The presentation of trouble-making behavior which can finally conclude the adjustment in a place of protection, develops England’s code of practice.

            According to guidelines for identifying children with behavior problems include traits such as irregular school attendance, withdrawal symptoms, insalubrious habits, high contingency on drugs and alcoholic substances, uncontrolled, crazy, and troublesome behavior, attempts to distract other learners, and mental disturbance.

            THEORETICAL ANALYSIS

            The biophysical model

            The biophysical model suggests that behavioral and emotional issues existing in teenagers stem from biological and physical factors, especially disorders of the “central nervous systems (CNS).” According to this model problems first arise from biological and physical factors and due to this reason problematic behavior could be traced back to physical illness, particularly disorders of CNS. A direct relation between physical disorder and problem behavior strongly supports this hypothesis, which states that behavior is an outcome of an internal physical problem ( Mäntymaa et al., 2012). The cause of the emotional and behavioral problems is treated as constitutive, which means that the behavioral problem neither arises from the body of the learner nor evolves from the atmosphere of the learner ( Dahl and Conway, 2009).

            Genetic factors

            This perspective plays an important part in developing teenagers’ behavior and emotions. Genetic factors have also a great influence on the teenager’s behavior and emotion. Two kinds of genetic disorders are identified, namely: an advanced disorder that starts at an early stage of life and exhibits some serious symptoms based on some sort of a genetic habit, leading to a poor prognosis. The second one is the reactive disorder, which appears suddenly and exhibits milder symptoms with better progress and without a genetic habit at the early stage. However, the view of genetic theory is quite controversial because of a lack of experimental evidence.

            Neurological factors

            These factors commonly known as “neurological factors” are significant contributors to an adolescent’s emotions and behavior. A brain dysfunction can also influence a child’s emotions and behaviors. Many symptoms can be seen when a child’s brain is damaged ( Erturk Kara, 2017); for example, mental uncertainty, confusion, hallucination, loss of impulse control, hyperactivity, divisibility, and liability. However, it is not so easy to determine whether the learner is experiencing these symptoms, as they can sometimes be mistaken for different conditions ( Dahl and Conway, 2009).

            Developmental theory

            The development theorists posit that delays in children’s development may make individuals susceptible to behavioral and emotional issues during adolescence. According to this theory some learners who exhibit behavioral and emotional problems have nervous systems that do not develop in accordance with their age. Developmental theorists have posited that delays in child development can be a reason for making a susceptible to initiating behavioral and emotional problems ( Gharamaleki and Rajabi, 2010). Different parts of development can exhibit delays, i.e., sensory integration, neurological organization, etc. Stage theorists suggest that a learner must complete earlier stages of development, prior to meeting the challenges of the subsequent phases of development ( Waller et al., 2014). Youngsters showing poor social skills or learning problems need to improve their lower developmental skills ( Mäntymaa, 2012).

            Pre-test analysis
            Sample

            Secondary High school students will fill in appropriate questionnaires. A sample of 406 students, including 203 from public and 203 from private secondary high schools, was selected using the Slovene formula. The study was carried out in four government and four private secondary high schools in the Peshawar district for children falling in the age range of 13-18 years. The four towns of district Peshawar were considered as four clusters, of which one and three were randomly selected.

            Instruments

            After validation through the pre-testing stage, an instrument for Problems with School Children was adopted for use in the main study. A structured questionnaire containing 30 closed-ended questions was used to collect the data ( Table 1).

            Table 1:

            Psychometric properties of the Problem with School Children Scale (PWSCS) used in the study.

            ScaleNo. of itemsMeanSD α Skew
            PWSCS3023.311.700.8720.802

            Abbreviations: α, Cronbach’s alpha; PWSCS, Problem with School Children Scale; SD, standard deviation; Skew, skewness.

            The scale analysis showed that the scale is reliable and appropriate for the current population.

            Two scales were used in this study.

            1. Demographic questions

              Demographic data consists of a questionnaire relevant to the study variables of children’s age, gender, class, school, medical condition, socioeconomic status, and family system ( Annexure I).

            2. PWSCS-Urdu

              The measure (Urdu version), finalized in Phase I of the study, was used for assessing the emotional and behavioral aspects. The original scale was developed by the Canadian Paediatric Association in 2012 to identify psychological problems among school children. It contains 30 items, and all of the items have a 3-point range of responses (1-3) from 1 (No Concern), 2 (Minor Concern), and 3 (Major Concern). The total score ranges from 30 to 90, with higher scores reflecting problematic behavior. The reliability of the questionnaire is 0.93 for high school-age youth. The questionnaire has no copyright protection. The Urdu version of the instrument was used ( Annexure II).

            Procedure

            The current study included school children of both public and private schools of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, district Peshawar. The detailed data of the public and private schools was collected for drawing a random sample of district Peshawar through the Private Schools Regulatory Authority (PSRA) and District Education Office Peshawar.

            The data collection was started after obtaining permission from the authorities of both government and private schools. They were instructed about the purpose of the research. They were guaranteed that the collected data material would be kept confidential and only be used for research purposes for students and schools alike and will be used for research purpose only. The first page of the questionnaire ( Annexure I) included demographic information and the second page of the questionnaire ( Annexure II) included necessary instructions and the purpose of the study.

            Data analysis

            Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) 25 was used for the analysis of the data. The computed mean and SD for all the variables conveyed the concurrent validity of the instrument. A t-test was applied in order to determine whether significant differences existed between government and private school students. Given the study objectives, multiple regression analysis was carried out.

            RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

            The study explored the behavioral and emotional problems among secondary high school students. The study also investigated the effect of demographic factors on the occurrence of behavioral and emotional problems. Mean, SD, and Cronbach’s alpha of all variables were calculated apart from t-test and multiple regression analysis.

            Table 2 shows mean and SD values for behavioral and emotional problems. A finding indicates significant mean differences between emotional problems ( M = 7.14, P > 0.000) and behavioral problems ( M = 6.04, P > 0.000). Results indicate that high school students exhibited higher emotional problems as compared to behavioral problems.

            Table 2:

            Mean and SD of behavioral and emotional problems among secondary school children on study variables ( N = 406).

            Variables M SD P-valueLLUL
            Behavioral problems6.044.630.005.586.49
            Emotional problems7.144.240.006.727.55

            Abbreviations: LL, lower limit; M, mean; SD, standard deviation; UL, upper limit.

            Table 3 shows the SD, mean, and t-values for emotional and behavioral problems among private and government secondary high school students. The findings indicate no significant mean differences between government and private secondary school students with respect to emotional problems, with t (198) = 0.245, P > 0.294. Findings indicated significant mean differences in behavioral problems between government and private secondary school students, with t (198) = 0.2.50 P > 0.000. Overall analysis reveals that students in private schools face higher levels of emotional and behavioral problems compared to those in government secondary schools.

            Table 3:

            Mean, SD, and t-values of emotional and behavioral problems among private and government secondary school children on study variables ( N = 406).

            VariablesGovernment ( n = 203)Private ( n = 203) t (198) P-value95% CI
            M SD M SDLLUL
            Emotional problems7.084.497.193.980.2450.294−0.7250.932
            Behavioral problems5.463.536.615.472.500.0000.2482.04

            Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; LL, lower limit; M, mean; SD, standard deviation; UL, upper limit.

            Table 4 analysis results revealed that demographic variables (socioeconomic status and family) did not significantly predict emotional problems positively, while other demographic variables (gender, mental illness, status, and school type) did not significantly predict emotional problems negatively among secondary school students, accounting for 4% ( R = 0.042) of the variance in predicting emotional problems.

            Table 4:

            Multiple regression analysis showing the impact of demographic variables on the occurrence of emotional problems among high school children ( N = 406).

            Predictors B S.E. β t P-value R 2
            Constant5.331.0954.8680.000
            SES0.6570.4520.0731.4530.1470.042
            Gender−1.4610.544−0.137−2.6840.008
            Mental illness−0.4580.645−0.037−0.7100.478
            Family0.7040.4770.0761.4760.141
            School−1.2020.466−0.130−2.5800.010

            Abbreviations: β, standardized regression coefficient; B, regression coefficient; R 2, coefficient of determination; S.E, standard error; SES, low socioeconomic status.

            Table 5 analysis results revealed that demographic variables (socioeconomic status and family) did not significantly predict behavioral problems positively, while other demographic variables (gender, mental illness, status, and school type) did not significantly predict emotional problems negatively among secondary school students, accounting for 5% ( R = 0.053) of the variance in predicting behavioral problems.

            Table 5:

            Multiple regression analysis showing the impact of demographic variables on the occurrence of behavioral problems among high school children ( N = 406).

            Predictors B S.E. β t P-value R 2
            Constant−1.6303.53−0.4630.644
            SES0.6050.4510.0681.3420.1800.053
            Gender−1.2140.555−0.114−2.1870.029
            Mental illness−0.5710.645−0.046−0.8850.377
            Family0.7450.4750.0801.5660.118
            School−1.2620.465−0.136−2.7140.007

            Abbreviations: β, standardized regression coefficient; B, regression coefficient; R 2, coefficient of determination; S.E, standard error; SES, low socioeconomic status.

            Secondary high school students are more vulnerable to behavioral and emotional problems, as adolescence is a stage of stress and turmoil ( Varlinskaya and Spear, 2008). The current study was conducted to assess the difference in emotional and behavioral problems among secondary high school children.

            The first hypothesis aimed to explore emotional and behavioral problems among high school children, and the findings revealed significant mean differences in emotional problems ( M = 7.14, P > 0.000) and behavioral problems ( M = 6.04, P > 0.000) among secondary school students. Results indicate that high school students exhibited higher emotional problems as compared to behavioral problems. The results are consistent with prior studies by Collishaw et al. (2004), who determined that there is a wide fluctuation in the frequencies of emotional and behavioral problems among school students, and they face more emotional problems as compared to behavioral problems. A study conducted by Syed et al. (2009) found that teachers rated 38.3% of issues as emotional and 35.8% of issues as behavioral.

            Another study on emotional and behavioral problems in school children was carried out using Rutter rating scales. The study revealed a high rate of emotional problems as compared to antisocial and conduct problems ( Javed et al., 1992). Results of another study conducted in India on 957 school children using the Rutter behavioral scale showed that approximately 45.6% of the children experienced emotional problems, of which 36.5% of children also had behavioral problems ( Gupta et al., 2001). Another study conducted in India found behavioral and emotional problems in high school students at 25.6% and 74.4%, respectively ( McConaughy, 1993). Another study shows that in high school children have more emotional and behavioral problems compared to those in middle school ( Saleem and Mahmood, 2013). However, these issues persist in an increasing number of children. Still, sufficient research work has not been carried out in Pakistan to conclusively establish the incidence and extent of prevalence of emotional and behavioral problems ( Syed et al., 2009).

            According to the second hypothesis, the emotions and behavior of public and private high school students would differ significantly, and the results also revealed a non-significant difference between government secondary school students and private secondary school students in terms of emotional problems, with t (198) = 0.245, P > 0.294. Findings indicated significant mean differences between government and private secondary high school students with respect to behavioral problems, t (198) = 0.2.50 P > 0.000. The overall analysis indicates that students from private schools face higher levels of emotional and behavioral problems compared to those in government secondary schools. According to the results of a study conducted in Delhi by Rousseau (2008), on public and government high school students, private school students showed notably higher rates of emotional and behavioral problems, while public school students were considerably well due to their adjustment and coping strategies.

            The third hypothesis was tested, and the results of the current study revealed that demographic variables (socioeconomic status and family) did not significantly predict emotional and behavioral problems positively, while other demographic variables (gender, mental illness, status, and school type) did not significantly predict these problems among secondary high school children. These non-significant associations attribute no significant influence on the manifestation of such issues among secondary school children in the context of current study. These outcomes signify the complex interplay of various demographic variables in shaping emotional and behavioral outcomes among these children.

            According to the literature, behavioral and emotional problems in secondary high school adolescents are associated with low socioeconomic status, poor family systems, low self-esteem, social incompetence, isolation, and a lack of sense of well-being in the future. According to Konu et al. (2002), there is no relationship between poor school adjustment, poor school performance, excessive dropout rates, and gender. Numerous studies ( Keiley et al., 2003; Silver et al., 2010) have indicated a link between behavioral and emotional problems of youngsters and teenagers and associated parental family-related issues. Another study conducted by Abdel-Fattah et al. (2004) in Saudi Arabia associated a greater chance of rising behavioral and emotional problems with parental education level.

            Similarly, demographic factors were associated with emotional and behavioral problems among school students. Behavioral and emotional problems most often result from divorce, separation, and joblessness of parents ( Harland et al., 2002). Another study, conducted by Bittner et al. (2007), has shown a strong connection between socioeconomic status, family, and behavioral and emotional problems.

            Several studies ( Larsson and Frisk, 1999) also found that school students from low socioeconomic backgrounds reported more behavioral and emotional problems. Similarly, a study examining the influence of low socioeconomic status on mental health among school students was conducted on 541 Black and 379 White students. There was a strong relationship between poverty and emotional and behavioral problems in white children. According to Costello et al. (2011), strict parents and mental health problems in the family were also risk factors for child psychopathology.

            A longitudinal study conducted by Wadsworth and Achenbach (2005) also found that long-term adverse effects can be prevented if school students with emotional problems are identified early on as if they are not treated or go unnoticed, they will have long-term negative effects. Other experimental studies have examined the relationship between behavioral and emotional problems and gender but found no correlation.

            CONCLUSION

            The present study concluded that there is a predictive association between emotional and behavioral problems in secondary level school children as well as their demographic effects. It has been observed by Wilmshurst in 2009 that due to unawareness children have been overlooked in modern society and face a lot of behavioral and emotional problems. Likewise, according to the attention to kids and their well-being has expanded from psychology to other disciplines. The basis of developmental psychopathology and school psychology in the study of teenagers was established by the increased understanding of teenagers. The problems of children related to mental health have also been focused on fresh advancements and trends. Teachman (2008) stated that over time the notion of psychological health, quality of life, and well-being of children was replaced by mental illness. The study offered a unique opportunity to explore the phenomenology of the kinds, forms, and frequencies of behavioral and emotional problems. Furthermore, this research will also enhance the understanding of the experiences, appearances, and signs of emotional and behavioral problems influenced by the culture. Similarly, to realize the necessity for intervention and also for the establishment of psychological health facilities in schools, it is necessary to identify the kind, distribution, and strength of emotional and behavioral problems at appropriate times. The association between emotional and behavioral problems and child performance in school will also be identified in this study. The findings of this study will help in creating a child’s individual functional profile, which will be useful in planning interventions for children. The findings of this study emphasize the significance of early identification and intervention to support the mental health and well-being of students in both school settings. Besides the valuable contribution of the current research, a few limitations are indicated that could be addressed by future researchers in this area. For instance, the first limitation of this study is the limited scope that restricts the generalizability of the findings to other contexts. Secondly, the cross-sectional design (instead of longitudinal) may also limit the impact on academic performance. Thirdly, the demographic factors considered by this study are limited and the socioeconomic factors such as family dynamics and cultural background may play an important part but could not be considered by this study. Finally, this study did not consider the influence of the leftover significant cultural differences (though it considers the emotional and behavioral aspects only). Future research studies should explore additional factors contributing to these issues and evaluate the effectiveness of intervention strategies in diverse educational contexts. Furthermore, future studies could effectively address the limitations indicated by this study.

            REFERENCES

            1. Abdel-Fattah MM, Asal AA, Al-Asmary SM, Al-Helali NS, Al-Jabban TM, Arafa MA. 2004. Emotional and behavioral problems among male Saudi schoolchildren and adolescents prevalence and risk factors. Ger. J. Psychiatry. Vol. 7:1–9

            2. Aynsley-Green A. 2014. Is all well with children and childhood and the health-related services provided for them in contemporary society? 1. Historical context and new opportunities. Curr. Pediatr. Vol. 14(2):145–153

            3. Berk LE. 2006. Child Development. 6th ed. Dorling Kindersley Publishing, Inc.. India:

            4. Bittner A, Egger HL, Erkanli A, Costello EJ, Foley DL, Angold A. 2007. What do childhood anxiety disorders predict? J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry Allied Discip. Vol. 48(12):1174–1183

            5. Burt SA. 2012. How do we optimally conceptualize the heterogeneity within antisocial behavior? An argument for aggressive versus non-aggressive behavioral dimensions. Clin. Psychol. Rev. Vol. 32(4):263–279

            6. Coholic DA, Eys M. 2015. Benefits of an arts-based mindfulness group intervention for vulnerable children. Child Adolesc. Soc. Work J. Vol. 33(1):1–13

            7. Collishaw S, Maughan B, Pickles A. 2004. Affective problems in adults with mild learning disability: the roles of social disadvantage and ill health. Br. J. Psychiatry. Vol. 185(4):350–351

            8. Costello EJ, Keeler GP, Angold A. 2011. Poverty, race/ethnicity, and psychiatric disorder: a study of rural children. Am. J. Public Health. Vol. 91(9):1494–1508

            9. Dahl RE, Conway AM. 2009. Self regulation and the development of behavioral and emotional problems: toward an integrative conceptual and translational research agendaBiopsychosocial Regulatory Processes in the Development of Childhood Behavioral Problems. Olsen S, Sameroff A. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge:

            10. Darewych OH, Bowers NR. 2017. Positive arts interventions: creative clinical tools promoting psychological wellbeing. Int. J. Art Ther. Vol. 23(2):62–69

            11. Erturk Kara HG. 2017. An analysis of children’s behavioral problems in the context of social skills and teacher child relationships. J. Turk. Stud. Vol. 12(17):195–212

            12. Foley JE, Weinraub M. 2017. Sleep, affect, and social competence from preschool to preadolescence: distinct pathways to emotional and social adjustment for boys and for girls. Front. Psychol. Vol. 8:711

            13. Freeman JB, Dale R, Farmer TA. 2011. Hand in motion reveals mind in motion. Front. Psychol. Vol. 2:59

            14. Gelfand MJ, LaFree G, Fahey S, Feinberg E. 2013. Culture and extremism. J. Soc. Issues. Vol. 69:495–517

            15. Gharamaleki N, Rajabi S. 2010. Efficacy of life skills training on increase of mental health and self esteem of the students. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. Vol. 5:1818–1822

            16. Gupta I, Verma M, Singh T, Gupta V. 2001. Prevalence of behavioral problems in school going children. Indian J. Pediatr. Vol. 68:323–326

            17. Harland P, Reijneveld SA, Brugman E, Verloove-Vanhorick SP, Verhulst FC. 2002. Family factors and life events as risk factors for behavioural and emotional problems in children. Eur. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry. Vol. 11:176–184

            18. Heyerdahl C, Kvernmo S, Wichstrøm L. 2004. Self-reported Behavioural/emotional problems in Norwegian adolescents from multiethnic areas. Eur. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry. Vol. 13:64–72

            19. Hong JS, Tillman R, Luby JL. 2015. Disruptive behavior in preschool children: distinguishing normal misbehavior from markers of current and later childhood conduct disorder. J. Pediatr. Vol. 166(3):723–730

            20. Javed MA, Kundi MZ, Khan PA. 1992. Emotional and behavioral problems among school children in Pakistan. J. Pak. Med. Assoc. Vol. 42(8):181–183

            21. Keiley MK, Lofthouse N, Bates JE, Dodge KA, Pettit GS. 2003. Differential risks of covarying and pure components in mother and teacher reports of externalizing and internalizing behavior across ages 5 to 14. J. Abnorm. Child Psychol. Vol. 31:267–283

            22. Konu AI, Lintonen TP, Rimpelä MK. 2002. Factors associated with schoolchildren’s general subjective well-being. Health Educ. Res. Vol. 17(2):155–165

            23. Larsson B, Frisk M. 1999. Social competence and emotional/behaviour problems in 6-16 year old Swedish school children. Eur. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry. Vol. 8:24–33

            24. Lau M, Kan MY. 2010. Prevalence and correlates of problem behaviors among adolescents in Hong Kong. Asia Pac. J. Public Health. Vol. 22(3):354–364

            25. Mäntymaa M, Puura K, Luoma I, Latva R, Salmelin RK, Tamminen T. 2012. Predicting internalizing and externalizing problems at five years by child and parental factors in infancy and toddlerhood. Child Psychiatry Hum. Dev. Vol. 43(2):153–170. [Cross Ref]

            26. McConaughy SH. 1993. Advances in empirically based assessment of children’s behavioral and emotional problems. Sch. Psychol. Rev. Vol. 22(2):285–307

            27. Miller GW, Jones DP. 2014. The nature of nurture: refining the definition of the exposome. Toxicol. Sci. Vol. 137(1):1–2

            28. Rousseau C, Hassan G, Measham T, Lashley M. 2008. Prevalence and correlates of conduct disorder and problem behavior in Caribbean and Filipino immigrant adolescents. Eur. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry. Vol. 17:264–273

            29. Rutter M, Stevenson J. 2008. Developments in child and adolescent psychiatry over the last 50 yearsRutter’s Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 5th ed. Rutter M, Bishop D, Pine D, Scott S, Stevenson J, Taylor E, et al.. p. 3–17. Wiley Blackwell. USA:

            30. Saleem S, Mahmood Z. 2013. Risk and protective factors of emotional and behavioral problems in school children: a prevalence study. Pak. J. Psychol. Res. Vol. 28(2):239–260

            31. Salwa SH, Abdul-Wahid M, Al-Zuheiry SH, Al-Jashamy K. 2014. Emotional and behavioral problems among school children. Int. J. Dev. Res. Vol. 4(5):974–978

            32. Santos LM, Queirós FC, Barreto ML, Santos DN. 2016. Prevalence of behavior problems and associated factors in preschool children from the city of Salvador, state of Bahia, Brazil. Rev. Bras. Psiquiatr. Vol. 38(1):46–52. [Cross Ref]

            33. Santrock JW. 2007. Adolescence. 11th ed. Tata McGraw Hill Education. New York:

            34. Silver RB, Measelle JR, Armstrong JM, Essex MJ. 2010. The impact of parents, child care providers, teachers, and peers on early externalizing trajectories. J. Sch. Psychol. Vol. 48(6):555–583

            35. Syed EU, Hussein SA, Haidry SE. 2009. Prevalence of emotional and behavioral problems among primary school children in Karachi, Pakistan-multi-informant study. Indian J. Pediatr. Vol. 76(6):623–627

            36. Teachman JD. 2008. The living arrangements of children and their educational wellbeing. J. Fam. Issues. Vol. 29(6):734–761

            37. Varlinskaya EI, Spear LP. 2008. Social interactions in adolescent and adult Sprague–Dawley rats: impact of social deprivation and test context familiarity. Behav. Brain Res. Vol. 188(2):398–405

            38. Wadsworth ME, Achenbach TM. 2005. Explaining the link between low socioeconomic status and psychopathology: testing two mechanisms of the social causation hypothesis. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. Vol. 73:1146–1153

            39. Waller R, Gardner F, Viding E, Shaw DS, Dishion TJ, Wilson MN, et al.. 2014. Bidirectional associations between parental warmth, callous unemotional behavior, and behavior problems in high-risk preschoolers. J. Abnorm. Child Psychol. Vol. 42:1275–1285

            40. Wilmshurst L. 2009. Abnormal Child Psychology: A Developmental Perspective. Taylor & Francis. New York:

            41. Wolfe DA. 2016. Preventing Physical and Emotional Abuse of Children. Guilford. London:

            42. Zelizer VA. 2014. Pricing the Priceless Child: The Changing Social Value of Children. Princeton University Press. Princeton:

            Appendices

            ANNEXURE I: DEMOGRAPHIC DATA SHEET.
            Name
            Grade
            Gender MaleFemale
            Institute GovernmentPrivate
            Family system CombineIndividual
            Physical illness YesNo
            Financial conditions GoodPoor
            ANNEXURE II: PROBLEM WITH SCHOOL CHILDREN SCALE.
            Please perform your daily performance in the aspects below. Write according to observation.
            1. Interested in working with colleagues.
            2. Engage with colleagues.
            3. Dealing with the fellows.
            4. Relationship within the group.
            5. To play with ideas.
            6. To play alone.
            7. Fear in the mind and heart.
            8. Participating in talks or activities with others.
            9. Giving to others and taking your turn.
            10. To comfort and comfort others.
            11. Obeying rules and restrictions.
            12. Successfully adapting to changes in routine.
            13. Symptoms of physical pain: stomach, headache, etc.
            14. Period of attention.
            15. Don’t control the components.
            16. Be on the move at all times.
            17. Don’t listen to the instructions/instructions.
            18. Anger rises to the point of violence.
            19. Damage to property.
            20. Running away from school.
            21. He is often absent from school.
            22. He/she’s lying.
            23. It deceives.
            24. Breaking the law leads to legal problems.
            25. Repetitive movements or habits such as moving a hand or part of the body.
            26. Specific topics and topics to talk about.
            27. Acts that must be repeated repeatedly and compulsorily, like religious rituals.
            28. It’s often sad.
            29. He/She is often frightened.
            30. Difficulty of mood/mood.

            Author and article information

            Journal
            jdr
            Journal of Disability Research
            King Salman Centre for Disability Research (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia )
            1658-9912
            28 March 2024
            : 3
            : 3
            : e20240023
            Affiliations
            [1 ] Department of Psychology, Islamia College Peshawar, Peshawar, Pakistan ( https://ror.org/02p2c1595)
            [2 ] Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Faculty of Science, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh 11432, Saudi Arabia ( https://ror.org/05gxjyb39)
            [3 ] King Salman Center for Disability Research, Riyadh 11614, Saudi Arabia;
            [4 ] Sustainable Energy Technologies Center, College of Engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia ( https://ror.org/02f81g417)
            [5 ] Department of Psychology, Government Degree College Nowshera, Nowshera, Pakistan;
            Author notes
            Author information
            https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6082-3418
            Article
            10.57197/JDR-2024-0023
            db6e1153-fa8b-4c14-bed2-91a0210508c1
            Copyright © 2024 The Authors.

            This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

            History
            : 24 January 2024
            : 03 March 2024
            : 03 March 2024
            Page count
            Tables: 5, References: 42, Pages: 9
            Funding
            Funded by: King Salman Center for Disability Research
            Award ID: KSRG-2023-267
            The authors extend their appreciation to the King Salman Center for Disability Research (funder ID: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100019345) for funding this work through Research Group no KSRG-2023-267.
            Categories

            Education,Special education,Vocational technology,Social & Behavioral Sciences
            behavioral problems,emotional problems,demographic factors,secondary high school students,public,private institutions

            Comments

            Comment on this article