478
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    1
    shares

      If you have found this article useful and you think it is important that researchers across the world have access, please consider donating, to ensure that this valuable collection remains Open Access.

      Prometheus is published by Pluto Journals, an Open Access publisher. This means that everyone has free and unlimited access to the full-text of all articles from our international collection of social science journalsFurthermore Pluto Journals authors don’t pay article processing charges (APCs).

      scite_
       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A hand-up or a hand-out? An argument for concierge services for the development of innovation capacity in startups

      Published
      research-article
      * , ,
      Prometheus
      Pluto Journals
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            This study suggests that a concierge service, provided by governments, can assist startups to gain streamlined access to the services, capabilities and capital required to bring innovation efficiently and cost-effectively to market. It analyses a range of concierge models in five separate jurisdictions to determine best practice. The paper develops a rationale and working definition for a concierge service that will assist public sector managers to help young high-growth SMEs and startups to navigate the increasingly complex innovation ecosystem.

            Content

            Author and article information

            Journal
            10.2307/j50022063
            prometheus
            Prometheus
            Pluto Journals
            0810-9028
            1470-1030
            1 December 2020
            : 36
            : 4 ( doiID: 10.13169/prometheus.36.issue-4 )
            : 366-381
            Affiliations
            School of Business and Tourism, Southern Cross University, Bilinga, Queensland 4225, Australia
            Author notes
            [*]

            CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: david.noble@ 123456scu.edu.au

            Article
            prometheus.36.4.0366
            10.13169/prometheus.36.4.0366
            50a7ed67-f941-4d5a-a8f8-e3cab719bda2
            © 2020 Pluto Journals

            All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

            History
            Custom metadata
            eng

            Computer science,Arts,Social & Behavioral Sciences,Law,History,Economics

            References

            1. Agarwal, R., Bajada, C. and Brown, P. (2018) Barriers to University-Industry Collaboration, University of Technology, Sydney.

            2. Auerswald, P. and Branscomb, L. (2003) ‘Valleys of death and Darwinian seas: financing the invention to innovation transition in the United States’, Journal of Technology Transfer, 28, 3, pp.227–39.

            3. Auerswald, P., Branscomb, L., Demos, N. and Min, B. (2003) Understanding Private Sector Decision Making for Early-Stage Technology Development, report to the Advanced Technology Program, National Insitute for Standards and Technology, US Department of Commerce, May, available at https://www.belfercenter.org/sites/default/files/legacy/files/understanding.pdf (accessed October 2020).

            4. Baldock, R. and Mason, C. (2015) ‘Establishing a new UK finance escalator for innovative SMEs: the roles of the enterprise capital funds and angel co-investment fund’, Venture Capital, 17, 1–2, pp.1–28.

            5. Bell, J., Dodgson, M., Field, L. and Gough, P. (2015) Translating Research for Economic and Social Benefit: Country Comparisons, Australian Council of Learned Academies (ACOLA), Melbourne.

            6. Biggar Economics (2017) Economic Impact of Interface – The Knowledge Connection for Business, available at https://interface-online.org.uk/sites/default/files/Economic%20impact%20of%20Interface%20Executive%20Summary%20Sep%202017_0.pdf (accessed July 2018).

            7. Bozeman, B. and Boardman, C. (2013) ‘An evidence-based assessment of research collaboration and team science: patterns in industry and university-industry partnerships’, paper commissioned for the national research council study of the science of team science, available at http://sites.nationalacademies.org/cs/groups/dbassesite/documents/webpage/dbasse_085390.pdf (accessed October 2020).

            8. Branscomb, L. and Auerswald, P. (2002) Between Invention and Innovation: An Analysis of Funding for Early-Stage Technology Development, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg MD.

            9. Bruns, K., Bosma, N., Sanders, M. and Schramm, M. (2017) ‘Searching for the existence of entrepreneurial ecosystems: a regional cross-section growth regression approach’, Small Business Economics, 49, 1, pp.31–54.

            10. Bush, V. (1945) The Endless Frontier, report to the president on a program for postwar scientific research, Office of Scientific Research and Development, Washington DC.

            11. Choi, J. and Lee, J. (2017) ‘Repairing the R&D market failure: public R&D subsidy and the composition of private R&D’, Research Policy, 46, 8, pp.1465–78,

            12. Clayton, P., Feldman, M. and Lowe, N. (2018) ‘Behind the scenes: intermediary organizations that facilitate science commercialization through entrepreneurship’, Academy of Management Perspectives, 32, 1, pp.104–24.

            13. Dempwolf, C., Auer, J. and D'Ippolito, M. (2014) Innovation Accelerators: Defining Characteristics among Startup Assistance Organizations, Optimal Solutions Group, College Park MD.

            14. Department of Finance Services and Innovation (2018) NSW Innovation Concierge (NIC) Evaluation Report, NSW Government, Sydney.

            15. Flanagan, K., Uyarra, E. and Laranja, M. (2011) ‘Reconceptualising the “policy mix” for innovation’, Research Policy, 40, 5, pp.702-13.

            16. Ford, G., Koutsky, T. and Spiwak, L. (2007) ‘A valley of death in the innovation sequence: an economic investigation’, Research Evaluation, 18, 5, pp.343-56.

            17. Foreman-Peck, J. (2013) ‘Effectiveness and efficiency of SME innovation policy’, Small Business Economics, 41, 1, pp.55-70.

            18. Freeman, C. (1987) Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan, Pinter Publishers, London.

            19. Frølund, L. and Ziethen, M. (2016) ‘The wisdom of the intermediary: the role, function, and ways-of-being of the intermediary in a strategic program for university-industry relations’, Triple Helix, 3, 9.

            20. Garvin, D. and Margolis, J. (2015) ‘The art of giving and receiving advice’, Harvard Business Review, January–February, pp.60-71.

            21. Glushko, R. and Nomorosa, K. (2013) ‘Substituting information for interaction: a framework for personalization in service encounters and service systems’, Journal of Service Research, 16, 1, pp.21-38.

            22. Government of Canada (2015) Concierge Service: Your Guide to Innovation, available at https://canadabusiness.ca/blog/concierge-service-your-guide-to-innovation-1 (accessed July 2019).

            23. Government of Canada (2018) Innovation Advisors, available at https://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/080.nsf/eng/h_00010.html (accessed March 2019).

            24. Government of Canada (2019) Support for your Business, available at https://innovation.ised-isde. canada.ca/s/?language=en (accessed July 2019).

            25. Hannig, S. and Potter, J. (2018) Leveraging Business Development Services for SME Productivity Growth: International Experience and Implications for United Kingdom Policy, OECD Centre for Entrepreneurship, SMEs, Regions and Cities, Paris, November, available at www.oecd.org/industry/smes/Final%20Draft%20Report_V11 (accessed October 2020).

            26. Hekkert, M., Suurs, R., Negro, S., Kuhlmann, S. and Smits, R. (2007) ‘Functions of innovation systems: a new approach for analysing technological change’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74, 4, pp.413-32.

            27. Hughes, A. and Kitson, M. (2013) Connecting with the Ivory Tower, UK Innovation Research Centre, Cambridge.

            28. Izsák, K, Markianidou, P and Radošević, S. (2014) Lessons from a Decade of Innovation Policy, European Commission, Brussels.

            29. Jacobides, M. (2019) On Ecosystems and Egos, London Business School, 7 May, available at https://www.london.edu/lbsr/on-ecosystems-and-egos (accessed July 2018).

            30. Keech, W., Munger, M. and Simon, C. (2012) ‘Market failure and government failure’, paper presented at the Public Choice World Congress, Miami, available at http://michaelmunger.com/papers/keechmungersimon.pdf (accessed July 2019).

            31. Kehoe, J. (2018) ‘Morrison government fund offers $2b boost for SME loans’, Australian Financial Review, 14 November, available at https://www.afr.com/news/economy/new-fund-offers-2b-boost-for-sme-loans-20181113-h17ums (accessed November 2018).

            32. KPMG (2017) Evaluation of the Industrial Research Assistance Program, KPMG, Toronto.

            33. Kuratko, D., Fisher, G., Bloodgood, J. and Hornsby, J. (2017) ‘The paradox of new venture legitimation within an entrepreneurial ecosystem’, Small Business Economics, 49, 1, pp.119–40.

            34. Love, J. and Roper, S. (2015) ‘SME innovation, exporting and growth: a review of existing evidence’, International Small Business Journal, 33, 1, pp.28–48.

            35. Mandell, M., Keast, R. and Chamberlain, D. (2017) ‘Collaborative networks and the need for a new management language’, Public Management Review, 19, 3, pp.326–41.

            36. Mason, C. and Brown, R. (2014) ‘Entrepreneurial ecosystems and growth-oriented enterprises’, background paper prepared for the workshop organised by the OECD LEED Programme and the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs, available at http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/93748/ (accessed October 2020).

            37. Mazzucato, M. and Semieniuk, G. (2017) ‘Public financing of innovation: new questions’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 33, 1, pp.24–48.

            38. Miles, D. (2015) Growth through Innovation and Collaboration: A Review of the Cooperative Research Centres Programme, Canberra, available at http://www.business.gov.au/grants-and-assistance/Collaboration/CRC/CRC-Programme-Review/Documents/crc-report-growth-through-innovation-and-collaboration.pdf (accessed September 2016).

            39. Miller, P. and Bound, K. (2011) The Startup Factories, NESTA discussion paper, June, London, available at https://www.nesta.org.uk/report/the-startup-factories/ (accessed October 2020).

            40. Noble, D., Charles, M., Keast, R. and Kivits, R. (2019) ‘Desperately seeking innovation nirvana: Australia's cooperative research centres’, Policy Design and Practice, 2, 1, pp.15–24.

            41. National Research Council (2015) Concierge Service: Helping Make Expansion Dreams a Reality for Small Business, National Research Council Canada, Montréal, Quebec, available at https://nrc.canada.ca/en/stories/concierge-service-helping-make-expansion-dreams-reality-small-business (accessed May 2019).

            42. OECD (1999) Managing National Innovation Systems, OECD Publishing, Paris.

            43. OECD (2019a) OECD SME and Entrepreneurship Outlook 2019, available at https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/industry-and-services/oecd-sme-and-entrepreneurship-outlook-2019_34907e9c-en (accessed October 2020).

            44. OECD (2019b) University-Industry Collaboration: New Evidence and Policy Options, OECD Publishing, Paris.

            45. Pascoal, A. and do Rosário Cabrita, M. (2016) ‘Innovation ecosystems centred in EU-based science parks: recent past and new trends’ in Grant, K. and Wise, S. (eds), 4th International conference on innovation and entrepreneurship, Ryerson University, Toronto, pp.367–75.

            46. Patricio, J., Axelsson, L., Blomé, S. and Rosado, L. (2018) ‘Enabling industrial symbiosis collaborations between SMEs from a regional perspective’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 202, pp.1120–30.

            47. PwC (2013) The Startup Economy: How to Support Tech Startups and Accelerate Australian Innovation, available at https://www.digitalpulse.pwc.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/PwC-Google-The-startup-economy-2013.pdf (accessed June 2019).

            48. Rhodes, C. (2017) Business Statistics, Briefing Paper 06152, House of Commons Library, London, 28 December, available at https://pdf4pro.com/view/business-statistics-by-chris-rhodes-5b19ad.html (accessed October 2020).

            49. Ries, E. (2011) The Lean Startup: How Today's Entrepreneurs Use Continuous Innovation to Create Radically Successful Businesses, Crown Business, New York.

            50. Sapienza, H., Autio, E., George, G. and Zahra, S. (2006) ‘A capabilities perspective on the effects of early internationalization on firm survival and growth’, Academy of Management Review, 31, 4, pp.914–33.

            51. Scottish Executive (2005) Collaboration in Scotland: The Scottish Executive's Response to the Lambert Review, Edinburgh, available at https://www.nls.uk/scotgov/2005/0009586.pdf (accessed June 2018).

            52. Sinnewe, E., Charles, M. and Keast, R. (2016) ‘Australia's cooperative research centre program: a transaction cost theory perspective’, Research Policy, 45, 1, pp.195–204.

            53. Stam, E. (2015) ‘Entrepreneurial ecosystems and regional policy: a sympathetic critique’, European Planning Studies, 23, 9, pp.1759–69.

            54. Stam, E. and Spigel, B. (2016) Entrepreneurial Ecosystems, discussion paper 16-13, School of Economics, Utrecht University, available at https://ideas.repec.org/p/use/tkiwps/1613.html#download (accessed October 2020).

            55. West, E. (n.d.) The Concierge, available at https://www.theconciergesydney.com (accessed May 2019).

            56. Wilkins, J. (2014) ‘Stewardship of public service renewal and reform’, International Journal of Leadership in Public Services, 10, 4, pp.188–99.

            Comments

            Comment on this article