78
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      If you have found this article useful and you think it is important that researchers across the world have access, please consider donating, to ensure that this valuable collection remains Open Access.

      Prometheus is published by Pluto Journals, an Open Access publisher. This means that everyone has free and unlimited access to the full-text of all articles from our international collection of social science journalsFurthermore Pluto Journals authors don’t pay article processing charges (APCs).

      scite_
       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Rationality and Rhetoric in the Corporate World: The Corporate Annual Report as an Aristotelian Genre

      Published
      other
      ,
      Prometheus
      Pluto Journals
      Genre, Rhetoric, Rationality, Annual Reports, Amcor
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            This paper is part of a research programme into corporate annual reports. Reports do provide the information on the past performance, present state and future prospects which investors in listed companies require for the rational choices attributed to them. They also reveal the companies' responsiveness to the publics comprising the civil societies in which they are embedded. This effect requires more than strict rationality. To use Simon's distinction, the reports then entail both substantive and procedural rationalities. We argue that classical rhetoric and its recovery in the 'new rhetoric' yield useful approaches to the latter, and that annual reports comprise a genre in the rhetorical sense. We illustrate our case through generic features in the reports of the Australian-based multinational, Amcor. We suggest for future research that accounts of corporate functioning are incomplete unless they include the pre-structured interaction between companies and their publics which we have shown here through rhetoric.

            Content

            Author and article information

            Journal
            cpro20
            CPRO
            Prometheus
            Critical Studies in Innovation
            Pluto Journals
            0810-9028
            1470-1030
            September 2000
            : 18
            : 3
            : 303-317
            Article
            10032390 Prometheus, Vol. 18, No. 3, September 2000, pp. 303-317
            10.1080/713692069
            148763e5-a010-49c2-8300-2d0ce731fdb9
            Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC

            All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

            History
            Page count
            Figures: 0, Tables: 0, References: 24, Pages: 15
            Categories
            Miscellany

            Computer science,Arts,Social & Behavioral Sciences,Law,History,Economics
            Rhetoric,Amcor,Genre,Annual Reports,Rationality

            References

            1. Simon Herbert A.. 1978. . 'Rationality as process and as product of thought'. . American Economic Review . , Vol. 68:: 1––16. .

            2. Henriques Irene and Sadorsky Perry. . 1996. . 'The determinants of an environmentally responsive firm: An empirical approach'. . Journal of Environmental Economics and Management . , Vol. 30:: 381––95. .

            3. Nagy Robert A. and Obenberger Robert W.. 1994. . 'Factors influencing individual investor behaviour'. . Financial Analysts Journal . , Vol. 50:: 63––68. .

            4. Marino Arthur J.. . 1995. . 'Separating your annual report from the herd'. . Public Relations Quarterly . , Vol. 40((2)): 44––47. .

            5. Aristotle. . 1991. . The Art of Rhetoric . , Edited by: Lawson-Tancred Hugh. . London : : Penguin. .

            6. Henriques Irene and Sadorsky Perry. . 1999. . 'The relationship between environmental commitment and managerial perceptions of stakeholder importance'. . Academy of Management Journal . , Vol. 42((1)): 87––99. .

            7. Gouldner Alvin W.. 1955. . 'Metaphysical pathos and the theory of bureaucracy'. . American Political Science Review . , Vol. 49:: 496––507. .

            8. D'Aveni Richard A. and MacMillan Ian C.. 1990. . 'Crisis and the content of managerial communications: A study of the focus of attention of top managers in surviving and failing firms'. . Administrative Science Quarterly . , Vol. 35:: 634––57. .

            9. Fiol C. Marlene. . 1995. . 'Corporate communications Comparing executives' private and public statements'. . Academy of Management Journal . , Vol. 38:: 522––36. .

            10. Kabanoff Boris and Holt John. . 1996. . 'Changes in the espoused values of Australian organizations 1986-1990'. . Journal of Organizational Behaviour . , Vol. 17:: 201––19. .

            11. Gross Alan G.. 1990. . The Rhetoric of Science . , p. 10––11. . Cambridge , MA : : Harvard University Press. .

            12. Bazerman Charles. . 1994. . “'Systems of genres and the enactment of social intentions'. ”. In Genre and the New Rhetoric . , Edited by: Freedman Aviva and Medway Peter. . p. 79––101. . London : : Taylor & Francis. .

            13. Miller Carolyn R. . 1994. . “'Genre as social action'. ”. In Genre and the New Rhetoric . , Edited by: Freedman Aviva and Medway Peter. . p. 23––42. . London : : Taylor & Francis. .

            14. Fiol C. Marlene. . 1989. . 'A semiotic analysis of corporate language: Organizational boundaries and joint venturing'. . Administrative Science Quarterly . , Vol. 34:: 277––303. .

            15. Bowman Edward H. . 1984. . 'Content analysis of annual reports for corporate strategy and risk'. . Interfaces . , Vol. 14:: 61––71. .

            16. Ind Nicholas. . 1997. . The Corporate Brand . , London : : Macmillan Business. .

            17. Harvey David. . 1989. . The Conation of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change . , Oxford : : Blackwell. .

            18. Bettman James R. and Weitz Barton A.. 1983. . 'Attributions in the board room: Causal reasoning in corporate annual reports'. . Administrative Science Quarterly . , Vol. 28:: 165––83. .

            19. Salancik Gerald R. and Meindl James R.. 1984. . 'Corporate attributions as strategic illusions of management control'. . Administrative Science Quarterly . , Vol. 29:: 238––54. .

            20. Hinks D. A. G.. 1944. . 'Tisias and Corax and the invention of rhetoric'. . The Classical Quarterly . , Vol. 34:: 61––69. .

            21. Moss Roger. . 1982. . “'The case for Sophistry'. ”. In Rhetoric Revisited . , Edited by: Vickers Brian. . p. 207––24. . Binghamton , NY : : Centre for Medieval and Early Renaissance Studies. .

            22. Perelman Chaim. . 1970/1979. . “'The new rhetoric: A theory of practical reasoning'. ”. In The New Rhetoric and the Humanities: Essays on Rhetoric and its Application . , p. 1––42. . Dordrecht : : D. Reidel. .

            23. Useem Michael. . 1996. . Investor Capitalism: How Money Managers are Changing the Face of Corporate America . , New York : : Basic Books. .

            Comments

            Comment on this article