95
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      If you have found this article useful and you think it is important that researchers across the world have access, please consider donating, to ensure that this valuable collection remains Open Access.

      Prometheus is published by Pluto Journals, an Open Access publisher. This means that everyone has free and unlimited access to the full-text of all articles from our international collection of social science journalsFurthermore Pluto Journals authors don’t pay article processing charges (APCs).

      scite_
       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Entrepreneurship in Science: Case Studies from Liquid Crystal Application

      Published
      research-article
      ,
      Prometheus
      Pluto Journals
      Entrepreneurship, Scientists, Science, Technology, New Product Development, Risk
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            Current UK policy on the knowledge-driven economy places a heavy weight of expectation on the fostering of entrepreneurial attitudes amongst university scientists. Interviews with the owner-managers of innovative companies in liquid crystal technology suggest that scientist-entrepreneurs are not simply scientists who have become imbued with the entrepreneurial spirit. They are also characterised by particular approaches to science and market intelligence. As scientists, they are fascinated by science-based effects (rather than science as a body of knowledge), knowledge of which tends to be acquired through interpersonal networks. Their knowledge of markets, similarly, tends to be acquired by networking with users. The result is a dynamic mental landscape in which application possibilities constantly churn against user needs to yield a stream of new product concepts, and in which there exists the possibility of insuring against the risks of career moves and strategic changes of direction. Assuming these findings can be replicated in further research, the implication is that the formation of scientist-entrepreneurs may need to foster 'concrete' attitudes towards science and a networking style of operation.

            Content

            Author and article information

            Journal
            cpro20
            CPRO
            Prometheus
            Critical Studies in Innovation
            Pluto Journals
            0810-9028
            1470-1030
            June 2000
            : 18
            : 2
            : 133-147
            Article
            10032379 Prometheus, Vol. 18, No. 2, June 2000, pp. 133-147
            10.1080/713692057
            eea5ee11-fb1a-4f1a-a4ac-781f7d533579
            Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC

            All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

            History
            Page count
            Figures: 0, Tables: 0, References: 25, Pages: 15
            Categories
            Original Articles

            Computer science,Arts,Social & Behavioral Sciences,Law,History,Economics
            Scientists,Science,Risk,Technology,New Product Development,Entrepreneurship

            References

            1. Cabrai R.. 1998. . 'The Cabral-Dahab science park management paradigm: an introduction'. . International Journal of Technology Management . , Vol. 16((8)): 721––5. .

            2. Georghiou L. . 1996. . 'The UK Technology Foresight programme'. . Futures . , Vol. 28((4)): 359––77. .

            3. Anderson J.. 1997. . 'Technology foresight for competitive advantage'. . Long Range Planning . , Vol. 30((5)): 665––77. .

            4. Solomon G. T., Weaver K. M. and Femald L. W.. 1994. . 'A historical examination of small business management and entrepreneurship pedagogy'. . Simulation and Gaming . , Vol. 25((3)): 338––52. .

            5. Preston J.. 1999. . 'Success factors in commercialising technology in the USA". In: . Presentation at CVCP Conference Driving Technology Transfer: Growing Enterprise in Universities; . February. 1999 ; , London .

            6. Sexton D. L., Upton N. B., Wacholtz L. E. and Mcdougall P. P.. 1997. . 'Learning needs of growth-oriented entrepreneurs'. . Journal of Business Venturing . , Vol. 12((1)): 1––8. .

            7. Copulsky W.. 1989. . 'Vision-innovation'. . Chemtech . , Vol. 19((5)): 279––82. .

            8. Welsh J. A.. 1984. . “'Entrepreneurial characteristics: the driving force'. ”. In Corporate Creativity . , Edited by: Smilor R. W. and Kuhn R. L.. p. 53––63. . New York : : Praeger. .

            9. Roberts Edward B.. 1991. . Entrepreneurs in High Technology: Lessons from M.I.T. and Beyond . , Oxford : : Oxford University Press. .

            10. Lipparini A. and Sobrero M.. 1994. . 'The glue and the pieces-entrepreneurship and innovation in small firm networks'. . Journal of Business Venturing . , Vol. 9((2)): 125––40. .

            11. Mumford M. D., Baughman W. A., Supinski E. P. and Maher M. A.. 1996. . 'Process-based measures of creative problem-solving skills. 2: Information encoding'. . Creativity Research Journal . , Vol. 9((1)): 77––88. .

            12. Reuber A. R. and Fischer E. M.. 1994. . 'Entrepreneurs' experience, expertise and performance of technology-based firms'. . IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management . , Vol. 41((4)): 365––74. .

            13. Jo H. and Lee J.. 1996. . 'The relationship between an entrepreneur's background and performance in a new venture'. . Technovation . , Vol. 16((4)): 161––71. .

            14. Daghfous A. and White G. R.. 1994. . 'Information and innovation: a comprehensive representation'. . Research Policy . , Vol. 23((3)): 267––80. .

            15. Shan W. J.. 1990. . 'An empirical-analysis of organizational strategies by entrepreneurial high-technology firms'. . Strategic Management Journal . , Vol. 11((2)): 129––39. .

            16. Yap C. M. and Souder W. E.. 1994. . 'Factors influencing new product success and failure in small entrepreneurial high-technology electronics firms'. . Journal of Product Innovation Management . , Vol. 11((5)): 418––32. .

            17. Gemunden H. G., Heydebreck P. and Herden R. . 1992. . 'Technological interweavement-a means of achieving innovation success'. . R&D Management . , Vol. 22((4)): 359––76. .

            18. Shaw B.. 1993. . 'Formal and informal networks in the UK medical equipment industry'. . Technovation . , Vol. 13((6)): 349––65. .

            19. Christensen J. F.. 1995. . 'Asset profiles for technological innovation'. . Research Polity . , Vol. 24((5)): 727––45. .

            20. Turpin T., Garrett-Jones S. and Rankin N.. 1996. . 'Bricoleurs and boundary riders: managing basic research and innovation knowledge networks'. . R&D Management . , Vol. 26((3)): 267––82. .

            21. Gibbons M., Limoges C., Nowotny H., Scharzman S., Scott P. and Trow M.. 1994. . The Mew Production of Knowledge: the Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies . , London : : Sage. .

            22. Tomes A., Armstrong P. and Erol R. . 1999. . “'Networking new product development: the integration of technical and product innovation'. ”. In Managing New Product Innovation . , Edited by: Jerrard R., Newport R. and Trueman M.. p. 181––92. . London : : Taylor and Francis. .

            23. Cooper R. G.. 1979. . 'The dimensions of industrial new product success and failure'. . Journal of Marketing . , Vol. 50:: 7––17. .

            24. Iansiti M.. 1995. . 'Shooting the rapids: managing product development in turbulent environments'. . California Management Review . , Vol. 38((1)): 37––58. .

            25. Erol R, Tomes A., Armstrong P. and Dunmur D.. 1998. . 'Accessing user worlds for product concepts'. . Design Journal . , Vol. 1((2)): 17––26. .

            Comments

            Comment on this article