97
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      If you have found this article useful and you think it is important that researchers across the world have access, please consider donating, to ensure that this valuable collection remains Open Access.

      Prometheus is published by Pluto Journals, an Open Access publisher. This means that everyone has free and unlimited access to the full-text of all articles from our international collection of social science journalsFurthermore Pluto Journals authors don’t pay article processing charges (APCs).

      scite_
       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      THE ACCORD AND PRODUCTIVITY IN THE AUSTRALIAN MANUFACTURING SECTOR

      Published
      research-article
      Prometheus
      Pluto Journals
      Accord, manufacturing, technical change, productivity
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            Productivity enhancement is at the forefront of the current programmes of microeconomic reform and award restructuring. However, the combination of the effects of the Accord, high real interest rates and restrictive demand management policies are constraining labour productivity growth. Technical progress in the Accord period has been largely capital augmenting, a reversal of earlier trends. The implication is that productivity growth is likely to be low in the future despite the emphasis of current supply side policy measures.

            Content

            Author and article information

            Journal
            cpro20
            CPRO
            Prometheus
            Critical Studies in Innovation
            Pluto Journals
            0810-9028
            1470-1030
            December 1990
            : 8
            : 2
            : 356-359
            Affiliations
            Article
            8629483 Prometheus, Vol. 8, No. 2, 1990: pp. 356–359
            10.1080/08109029008629483
            e34e6a76-a2ad-4145-9bb2-9dbec310e049
            Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC

            All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

            History
            Page count
            Figures: 0, Tables: 0, References: 13, Pages: 4
            Categories
            NOTE

            Computer science,Arts,Social & Behavioral Sciences,Law,History,Economics
            productivity,Accord,manufacturing,technical change

            NOTES AND REFERENCES

            1. Morris P.. 1989. . Award Restructuring: the Task Ahead . , Canberra : : Australian Government Publishing Service. .

            2. Skinner W.. 1986. . The productivity paradox. . Harvard Business Review . , Vol. 64((4)): 55––64. .

            3. Bureau of Industry Economics, Manufacturing Industry Productivity Growth: Causes, Effects and Implications, Research Report No. 21, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, 1986.

            4. OECD, ‘Total factor productivity’, OECD Economic Outlook, 42, December 1987, pp. 39–48.

            5. Budget Statement No. 2, 1989/90, p. 2.51, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra.

            6. Output: Gross product at 1984/5 prices, manufacturing. Labour: total person hours of employment, manufacturing. Capital: average net capital stock, manufacturing. Productivity: output growth less input growth. Real unit labour costs: average for the non-farm sector.

            7. C. Harris and R. Lattimore, Studies of Productivity Growth and Technical Efficiency in Australian Manufacturing, Bureau of Industry Economics, Working Paper No. 56, Canberra, 1989.

            8. Economic Planning Advisory Council (EPAC), Productivity in Australia: Results of Recent Studies, EPAC, paper No. 39, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, 1989.

            9. B. Hughes, J. Burgess and W. Dunlop, Neoclassical Formulation of Productivity Growth in Manufacturing, Department of Economics, University of Newcastle, Research Report No. 172, 1990.

            10. The trends in the Westpac/Confederation of Australian Industry survey are contained in Budget Statement, ibid., p. 2.21.

            11. D. Moore ‘Industrial relations and the failure of the Accord: what should be done?’, Australian Bulletin of Labour, June 1989, pp. 153–183.

            12. op. cit.

            13. For evidence of downturn in manufacturing expectations see Westpac Review, 37, December 1989, p. 4.

            Comments

            Comment on this article