118
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      If you have found this article useful and you think it is important that researchers across the world have access, please consider donating, to ensure that this valuable collection remains Open Access.

      Prometheus is published by Pluto Journals, an Open Access publisher. This means that everyone has free and unlimited access to the full-text of all articles from our international collection of social science journalsFurthermore Pluto Journals authors don’t pay article processing charges (APCs).

      scite_
       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      UNDEMOCRATIC VISTAS

      Published
      research-article
      Prometheus
      Pluto Journals
      Bookmark

            Content

            Author and article information

            Journal
            cpro20
            CPRO
            Prometheus
            Critical Studies in Innovation
            Pluto Journals
            0810-9028
            1470-1030
            December 1988
            : 6
            : 2
            : 382-400
            Affiliations
            Article
            8629323 Prometheus, Vol. 6, No. 2, 1988: pp. 382–400
            10.1080/08109028808629323
            c85d4f3e-4eda-46dc-b1fd-8afe9485ad45
            Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC

            All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

            History
            Page count
            Figures: 0, Tables: 0, References: 8, Pages: 19
            Categories
            Review Articles

            Computer science,Arts,Social & Behavioral Sciences,Law,History,Economics

            NOTES AND REFERENCES

            1. Musonius Rufus, Should Women Too Do Philosophy?, Teubner edition by O. Hense (Leipzig: 1905); see also C.E. Lutz, Yale Classical Studies (1947), p. 3ff.

            2. For the national statistics, my resources are Involvement in Learning: Realizing the Potential of American Higher Education, Report of the Study Group on the Conditions of Excellence in American Higher Education, sponsored by the National Institute of Education, October 1984, and General Education in a Free Society: Report of the Harvard Committee Harvard University Press, 1945); the particular statistics about universities in Bloom's “sample” have been obtained from admissions offices and/or dean's offices.

            3. See Martha Nussbaum and Amartya K. Sen, “Internal Criticism and Indian Rationalist Traditions”, a Working Paper of the World Institute for Development Economics Research, Helsinki, and to be published in Relativism, ed. M. Krausz (Notre Dame University Press, 1988); also Bimal K. Matilal, Perception (Oxford University Press, 1985).

            4. See especially Benjamin Schwartz, The World of Thought in Ancient China (Harvard University Press, 1985).

            5. The same view is asserted in Bloom's notes to his translation of the Republic (Basic Books, 1968), without any more satisfactory argument than what is presented here.

            6. For this and other related evidence, and a discussion, see Mary R. Lefkowitz, Women in Greek Myth (Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986), p. 144.

            7. A different and genuinely democratic approach to core requirements (at the level of elementary and secondary, not university, education) is carefully argued for in E.D. Hirsch, Jr., Cultural Literacy: What Every American Needs to Know (Houghton Mifflin, 1987).

            8. See reference above, note 2. The commiteee that prepared the report was chaired by Paul H. Buck; John H. Finley, Jr., was vice-chairman. Its members were: Raphael Demos, Leigh Hoadley, Byron S. Hollinshead, Wilbur K. Jordan, I.A. Richards, Phillip J. Rulon, Arthur M. Schlesinger, Robert Ulich, George Wald, and Benjamin F. Wright.

            Comments

            Comment on this article