88
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      If you have found this article useful and you think it is important that researchers across the world have access, please consider donating, to ensure that this valuable collection remains Open Access.

      Prometheus is published by Pluto Journals, an Open Access publisher. This means that everyone has free and unlimited access to the full-text of all articles from our international collection of social science journalsFurthermore Pluto Journals authors don’t pay article processing charges (APCs).

      scite_
       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Evolution of the Digital Computation Industry

      Published
      research-article
      , ,
      Prometheus
      Pluto Journals
      Uncertainty, Evolution, Computer Industry, Knowledge
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            All industries are based upon a core of knowledge. Economic evolution is the growth of this knowledge as an experimental and path-dependent process involving markets, firms, finance, entrepreneurship, and often substantial uncertainty. In the set of industries associated with information technology, the core of knowledge is programmable digital computation (PDC). In this paper, we outline the origins and development of PDC, and in particular the path from the mainframe industry to the PC. We tell this story in order to highlight a number of salient features about the relationship between competition and evolution. First, the predominant form of competition was not focused about competitive pricing in existing markets, but rather for the creation of new markets and therefore monopoly positions. Second, as the IBM story demonstrates, this involved leveraging competencies between markets, often deliberately destroying a market in order to create a new one. Third, as the hacker tradition illustrates, much of the entrepreneurial development of the industry came from the users, due to their close conception of the technological possibilities and opportunities. Fourth, we highlight the overarching importance of the setting of standards (by fiat, by self-organization, or by monopoly) and the role this has in reducing uncertainty. We offer some policy and management lessons based upon this analysis.

            Content

            Author and article information

            Journal
            cpro20
            CPRO
            Prometheus
            Critical Studies in Innovation
            Pluto Journals
            0810-9028
            1470-1030
            December 2002
            : 20
            : 4
            : 323-336
            Article
            10032469 Prometheus, Vol. 20, No. 4, December 2002, pp. 323-336
            10.1080/0810902021000023372
            9788115c-d1be-480c-b8d7-a25cc3f6cff5
            Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC

            All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

            History
            Page count
            Figures: 0, Tables: 0, References: 32, Pages: 14
            Categories
            Original Articles

            Computer science,Arts,Social & Behavioral Sciences,Law,History,Economics
            Knowledge,Uncertainty,Evolution,Computer Industry

            References

            1. Freiberger P. and Swaine M.. 1984. . Fire in the Valley . , p. 3––4. . Berkeley : : Osborne/McGraw Hill. .

            2. Chopsky J. and Leonsis T.. 1988. . Blue Magic The People, Power and Politics Behind the IBM Personal Computer . , p. 4 New York : : Facts On File, Inc.. .

            3. Chandler A. D.. . 1997. . “'The computer industry: the first half-century'. ”. In Competing in the Age of Digital Convergence . , Edited by: Yoffie D. B.. p. 41 Boston : : Harvard Business School. .

            4. Henderson R. M. and Clark K. B.. 1990. . 'Architectural innovation: the reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms'. . Administration Quarterly . , Vol. 35:: 9––30. .

            5. Potts J.. 2000. . The New Evolutionary Microeconomics: Complexity, Competence and Adaptive Behaviour . , p. 68––70. . Cheltenham , , UK: : Edward Elgar. .

            6. Holland J. H.. 1995. . Hidden Order How Adaptation Builds Complexity . , p. 28 Cambridge , MA : : Perseus Books. .

            7. Langlois R. N.. 1992. . 'External economics and economic progress: the case of the microcomputer industry'. . Business History Review . , Vol. 66:: 9

            8. Moritz M.. 1984. . The Little Kingdom: The Private Story of Apple Computer . , p. 126 New York : : William Morrow and Company, Inc.. .

            9. Choi Y. B.. 1993. . Paradigms and Conventions: Uncertainty, Decision Making and Entrepreneurship . , Ann Arbor : : University of Michigan Press. .

            10. Loasby B. J.. 1999. . Knowledge, Institutions and Evolution in Economics . , London : : Routledge. .

            11. Shackle G. L. S.. 1972. . Epistemics and Economies: A Critique of Economic Doctrines . , Cambridge : : Cambridge University Press. .

            12. Cringely R. X.. 1996. . Accidental Empires . , London : : Penguin Books. .

            13. Buenstorf G.. 2001. . Designing Clunkers: Demand-Side Innovation and the Early History of the Mountain Bike . , Max Planck Institute for Research into Economic Systems, Evolutionary Economics Unit. .

            14. Moschella D. C.. 1997. . Waves of Power The Dynamics of Global Technology Leadership 1964-2010 . , p. 10 New York : : AMACOM. .

            15. Schumpeter J. A.. 1942. . Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy . , New York : : Harper Perennial. .

            16. Robertson P.. 1996. . “'Competencies, transaction costs and competitive strategy'. ”. In Towards a Competence Theory of the Firm . , Edited by: Foss N. J. and Knudsen C.. p. 75––96. . London : : Routledge. .

            17. Potts J.. 2001. . 'Knowledge and markets'. . Journal of Evolutionary Economics . , Vol. II:: 1––19. .

            18. Loasby B. J.. 1998. . “'The concept of capabilities'. ”. In Economic Organisation, Capabilities and Coordination: Essays in Honour of G.B. Richardson . , Edited by: Foss N. J. and Loasby B. J.. London : : Routledge. .

            19. Harrington J. E.. . 1999. . 'Rigidity of social systems'. . Journal of Political Economy . , Vol. 107:: 40––64. .

            20. Grove A. S.. 1996. . Only the Paranoid Survive . , p. 127 New York : : Currency/Doubleday. .

            21. Christensen C. M. and Bower J. L.. 1996. . 'Customer power, strategic investment, and the failure of leading Erms'. . Strategic Management Journal . , Vol. 17:: 197––218. .

            22. Mandeville T.. 2000. . 'Measuring up in the new economy'. . Australian Financial Review . , 17-November;: 4––5. .

            23. Hearn G., Mandeville T. and Anthony D.. 1998. . The Communications Superhighway: Social and Economic Change in the Digital Age . , St. Leonards , New South Wales : : Alien & Unwin. .

            24. Arrow K.. 1974. . The Limits of Organization . , New York : : W.W. Narton & Co.. .

            25. Mandeville T.. 1996. . Understanding Novelty . , Norwood , NJ : : Ablex Publishing Corp.. .

            26. Rooney D., Hearn G., Mandeville T. and Joseph R.. 2002. . Public Policy in the Knowledge Economy . , Cheltenham , , UK: : Edward Elgar. .

            27. Schumpeter J. A.. 1950. . Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, . , 3rd edition. , p. 83Harper and Brother. .

            Comments

            Comment on this article