47
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      From January 2024, all of our readers will be able to access every part of ROAPE as well as its archive without a paywall. This will make ROAPE accessible to a much wider readership, especially in Africa. We need subscriptions and donations to make this revolutionary intiative work. 

      Subscribe and Donate now!

       

      scite_
       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Ruth First Prize

      Published
      editorial
      *
      Review of African Political Economy
      Review of African Political Economy
      Bookmark

            Main article text

            The Editorial Working Group of Review of African Political Economy is pleased to announce the 2018 winner of the Ruth First prize. The prize is awarded for the best article published by an African author in the journal in a publication year.

            This year, the prize was awarded to Mondli Hlatshwayo for his article ‘The new struggles of precarious workers in South Africa: nascent organisational responses of community health workers’. It was published in ROAPE volume 45, issue 157, in autumn 2018.

            The article shines a spotlight on community health workers, who remain a blind spot in the literature on South African labour studies. Abandoned by mainstream unions and often ignored by labour scholars, the article reveals that community health workers are crafting their own nascent organisational responses as women and as precarious workers.

            Hlatshwayo highlights the ‘paradox of victory’ for the African National Congress, by which trade unions and workers achieved a formal dismantling of apartheid laws and gained organisational rights for labour, but economic liberalisation led to massive retrenchments, the rise of labour flexibility and the pauperisation of workers. This demands more focus on workers’ struggles outside the formal union structures, with care not to exaggerate or romanticise their nascent and fragile forms. In this case of health workers, it is a struggle for recognition as employees of the state who receive a living wage, rather than as ‘volunteers’ with a stipend and no employment benefits. They have constructed alliances that include left-wing, labour-supporting non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and health organisations. Beyond this, the Gauteng Health Workers’ Forum is influenced by the Cuban health care system and debates the reconceptualisation of their role as agents for social change, no longer alienated from control of their work, and with the interests of the poor and marginalised at the centre of their practice.

            The ROAPE Prize Committee commented on Hlatshwayo’s article:

            It was a strong piece of research exploring precarious work and alternative forms of organising, outside the straitjacket of established unions. The struggles of community health workers represent new worker-led initiatives in South Africa. This is bread-and-butter analysis for ROAPE. Particularly pleasing is that the women themselves are at the centre of the article. … In terms of Ruth First’s legacy, the paper was the most relevant and, crucially, engages actively with the flesh-and-blood subjects of its theoretical arguments and assumptions about labour struggles, something unfortunately all too rare in academic literature.

            One member of the committee observed that the article

            addresses an understudied area in labour struggles, through examining the labour struggles of precarious community health workers. It also explores the human consequences of many key themes of neoliberal state policy by showing the effects of precarious labour, the rise of ‘volunteerism’, cuts in health spending and the outsourcing of public services in South Africa. I really liked the way that it engaged with the health workers themselves, allowing them to make key empirical and theoretical points. Also, this article is definitely the most in line with Ruth First’s work, looking at labour struggles, the exploitation of workers, and issues of gender and class.

            Mondli Hlatshwayo is a Senior Researcher in the Centre for Education Rights and Transformation at the University of Johannesburg. Previously he worked for Khanya College, a Johannesburg-based NGO, as a researcher. His areas of research include precarious work, female migrants, migrant workers, politics of stadiums, unions and technological changes, workers’ education, trade unions and social movements. Hlatshwayo has published a number of peer-reviewed journal articles and book chapters on the above topics. He is co-editor (with Aziz Choudry) of the Pluto Press book Just work? Migrant workers’ struggle today (Choudry and Hlatshwayo 2015). His doctoral thesis, which he completed in 2012, was on trade union responses to technological change.

            The prize-winning article can be read free of charge until July 2020 on the Taylor & Francis Online ROAPE website: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03056244.2018.1483907.

            References

            1. , and , eds. 2015 . Just Work? Migrant Workers’ Struggle Today . London : Pluto Press . https://www.plutobooks.com/9780745335834/just-work/ .

            2. 2018 . “ The New Struggles of Precarious Workers in South Africa: Nascent Organisational Responses of Community Health Workers .” Review of African Political Economy 45 ( 157 ): 378 – 392 . https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03056244.2018.1483907 .

            Author and article information

            Journal
            CREA
            crea20
            Review of African Political Economy
            Review of African Political Economy
            0305-6244
            1740-1720
            June 2019
            : 46
            : 160
            : 182-183
            Author notes
            Article
            1660107
            10.1080/03056244.2019.1660107
            5c952c5f-9887-4992-b7ce-7cb0ca768281

            All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

            History
            Page count
            Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 2, Pages: 2
            Categories
            Editorial
            Editorial Notice

            Sociology,Economic development,Political science,Labor & Demographic economics,Political economics,Africa

            Comments

            Comment on this article