Average rating: | Rated 1 of 5. |
Level of importance: | Rated 1 of 5. |
Level of validity: | Rated 1 of 5. |
Level of completeness: | Rated 1 of 5. |
Level of comprehensibility: | Rated 1 of 5. |
Competing interests: | None |
Dear authors, thank you for asking me to review this. This article is very likely to get rejected without peer review from any journal. The title does not make grammatical sense, neither does the rest of the article. I am sorry if this disappoints you but this needs to be 'proof-read' from someone whose first language is English so that the correct grammar and vocabulary is used. I am not sure why a CT scan was done ( not in line with current international guidance such as the BTSI( as well as non-proven treatments given, outside of randomised clinical trials. Maybe the situation in low income countries is different and maybe you should concentrate on that. You might be able to concentrate more on the points of return to work after a critical illness, or the anxieties around such a disease. Regards, Dr Avinash Aujayeb